“Virginia, you can speak for yourself? Right?”

“While the Nov. 3 general election is less than 11 weeks away, both candidates will be busy trying to secure the extra vote. Lewis, as expected, locked up one berth with a convincing showing in Tuesday’s primary. No surprise there. “

“Haugen supporters have indicated that she has maintained a low profile in the mayoral race, apparently letting Erickson do her talking.”

Hmmm…not endorsing? I guess the key word here would be “intend”…just an observation. I didn't know that mocking other candidates and their supporters, while clearly showing positive support for another candidate was unbiased (sarcastically stated). Maybe you should check out all the negative posts coming from Pete's supporters. You could say that they are speaking for Pete as well, but that wouldn't be ethical or fair to Mayor Lewis, would it?

Why does it have to be that Shelley is speaking for Virginia? Could we now say that all of Pete's supporters are speaking for him? Why, now, would Virginia (of all people) have to hide behind Shelley? We all know that she has never been one to hide or keep her mouth shut if she has something to say. Yes, you are right when you say Shelley has a right to speak her opinion, but you are dead wrong, very unfair, and very bias when you put those opinions in Virginia's mouth. That would be stating a personal opinion, not fact, wouldn't it?

Unbiased, I think not.

As editor of a newspaper you should know better.

“Virginia, you can speak for yourself? Right?”

“While the Nov. 3 general election is less than 11 weeks away, both candidates will be busy trying to secure the extra vote. Lewis, as expected, locked up one berth with a convincing showing in Tuesday’s primary. No surprise there. “

“Haugen supporters have indicated that she has maintained a low profile in the mayoral race, apparently letting Erickson do her talking.”

Hmmm…not endorsing? I guess the key word here would be “intend”…just an observation. I didn't know that mocking other candidates and their supporters, while clearly showing positive support for another candidate was unbiased (sarcastically stated). Maybe you should check out all the negative posts coming from Pete's supporters. You could say that they are speaking for Pete as well, but that wouldn't be ethical or fair to Mayor Lewis, would it?

Why does it have to be that Shelley is speaking for Virginia? Could we now say that all of Pete's supporters are speaking for him? Why, now, would Virginia (of all people) have to hide behind Shelley? We all know that she has never been one to hide or keep her mouth shut if she has something to say. Yes, you are right when you say Shelley has a right to speak her opinion, but you are dead wrong, very unfair, and very bias when you put those opinions in Virginia's mouth. That would be stating a personal opinion, not fact, wouldn't it?

Unbiased, I think not.

As editor of a newspaper you should know better.